There are no translations available.
ATT: USPTO Director David J. Kappos & Team
Dear USPTO Directors:
I am 1st to invent and 1st to file and 1st NOT TO PUBLISH my inventions, because what The Patent Office does not offer the Modern Wiser Inventor, is the needed Commercial Protection for the invention.
I have been employing a new wiser way to secure no sorrow or losses to my work, and also started sharing modern wisdom with Inventors and Investors who visit one of my websites - where I am sharing information on the way we can make better good use of the Patent Office, which is also the only way possible to get any value and justify the high costs of the patent allowance process which only give grounds for lawsuits like infringement and alike, lawsuits most inventors can not afford to fund as additional costs for effective Commercial Protection, only corporations like Apple, IBM, SONY, and other such major clients of yours who can supply the needed further protection in addition to any Patent protection they apply for and obtain to protect.
If Provisional Patent had NO TIME LIMITATIONS, it may be more useful for 'independent inventors', but without entering my yet better proposal and my general feedback hereby with recommendations for wise improvements to the key flaws in the Patent method in delivering new art by granting The Grace of the Patent - where the real needed promise is not delivered and which the "prepatent-method" delivers, the need to protect the best interests of the invention representing a discovery or technology or any new original art, as a product, service or capability beneficial and safe plus wanted and/or needed by consumers - and the owners of the incorporated invention, its founding inventor(S) and inventor(s).
The WEBSITE is a DRAFTED WORKING MODEL of the Prepatent Partnering and Incubation HUB for registering 'sweat-equity' in merging new incorporations developing new 'patentable' Products & Services - with a vision on a worldwide basis administration under a "Taxation-Treaty" yet to be implemented in the future - and yet, the model is set to serve local, regional and national corporate interests, in all International market places.
Employing existing legal options, I have reserved my rights for new or renewed applications; as well as am the sole owner of other major inventions yet unknown and not understood, but as a result of my work as the lobbyist for our regional inventors society many years ago, my listening to our inventors is why I have developed the PrePatent-Registry and also its Trading-Post both key concepts of the "Super Economy"resulted from making America again the lands of opportunities granted...
Mr. Amnon M. Cohen
Please note: More then A Month after, no respectful nor acknowledgment reply received - I had contacted again the USA PTO, and a reply was/is (Edited for security and privacy)
Thank you for your email dated April 20, 2010 which was considered feedback as opposed to a specific question for response. Most emails received in the independent inventor mailbox are general questions from the public about the patent process.
The USPTO frequently hears from the public about the need to have provisional applications pending for more than 12 months and has recently published a Federal Register Notice entitled "Request for Comments on Proposed Change to Missing Parts Practice", you can find the notice as PDF
In short this practice would effectively provide a 12-month extension to the 12-month provisional application.
Should you have additional questions directed to the proposed change in practice you can contact the Office of Patent Legal Administration at 571-272-7727.
If you have additional questions with regard to this email you can contact me at ...
C K - USPTO
I have again emailed that this is not what I have been asking for, and the need for pre-patent registration is a real solution for the problems the USAPTO is facing.
Maybe being a key Inventions' Registrar does not grant understanding or openness to yet new Innovations...lol - hahahau.